This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| 2 minutes read

Copyright Issues with Generative AI

Generative AI is a branch of artificial intelligence that can create new content such as text, images, music, and code based on a given input. For example, ChatGPT is a generative AI model that can generate human-like text in response to any prompt. Generative AI has many potential applications and benefits for content creation, but it also raises some important legal and ethical questions regarding copyright.

One of the main questions is who owns the rights to the content generated by generative AI. Is it the user who provides the input, the developer who creates the algorithm, or the AI itself? The answer is not clear and may depend on various factors such as the level of human involvement, creativity, and originality in the process. Different jurisdictions may have different laws and interpretations on this issue.

However, the U.S. Copyright Office currently requires a human author for a copyrightable work and does not recognize works created by non-human entities such as animals or machines. This means that works generated by generative AI without any human intervention or modification may not be eligible for copyright protection. However, this requirement has been challenged by some lawsuits that claim that generative AI can produce original and creative works that deserve recognition and protection.

Another question is whether using generative AI infringes the rights of others. Generative AI models are trained on large datasets of existing works such as texts, images, music, etc. These works may be protected by copyright and may require permission or license from the original authors or owners. However, it may be difficult or impossible to identify and track all the sources of data used by generative AI models. Moreover, some generative AI models may produce outputs that are similar or identical to existing works by chance or design. This may raise issues of plagiarism, imitation, or derivation.

There are also questions about how fair use doctrine applies to generative AI. Fair use is a legal principle that allows limited use of copyrighted works without permission for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. Fair use depends on four factors: the purpose and character of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount and substantiality of the portion used, and the effect of the use on the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. However, these factors may be hard to apply or measure in the context of generative AI.

In conclusion, generative AI poses many challenges and opportunities for content creation and copyright law. There is no definitive answer or consensus on how to deal with these issues yet. Therefore, users and developers of generative AI should be aware of the risks and responsibilities involved and seek legal advice when necessary.

In the Office’s view, it is well-established that copyright can protect only material that is the product of human creativity. Most fundamentally, the term “author,” which is used in both the Constitution and the Copyright Act, excludes non-humans.

Tags

copyright, ai, artificial intelligence, fair use, chatgpt, gpt4